5833
“In the original Trek, Khan, with his brown skin, was an Übermensch, intellectually and physically perfect, possessed of such charisma and drive that despite his efforts to gain control of the Enterprise, Captain Kirk (and many of the other officers) felt admiration for him.
And that’s why the role has been taken away from actors of colour and given to a white man. Racebending.com has always pointed out that villains are generally played by people with darker skin, and that’s true … unless the villain is one with intelligence, depth, complexity. One who garners sympathy from the audience, or if not sympathy, then — as from Kirk — grudging admiration. What this new Trek movie tells us, what JJ Abrams is telling us, is that no brown-skinned man can accomplish all that. That only by having Khan played by a white actor can the audience engage with and feel for him, believe that he’s smart and capable and a match for our Enterprise crew.”
—
Marissa Sammy on Star Trek: Into Whiteness.
perfect commentary which parallels what Rawles was saying earlier about the possibility of Moriarty being a person of color:
- “…The actual issue is that black people aren’t often allowed to play full and complete characters, and an antagonist who isn’t unintelligent, thuggish cannon fodder is just as much of a rarity for black men as the stubbly hero who saves the world or wtfever. “
- “…The stereotype in no way intersects with brilliant geniuses who choose to step outside of the boundaries of society in order to exercise their intellect while having no concern for lesser beings.
Or to break it down further: the problematic stereotype regarding black people is that of being, in essence, subhuman. Characters of the Moriarty (and Holmes) archetype are rooted in being superhuman.”
You see? It’s more complicated than “people of color get typecast as villains.”
Black people get typecast as an extremely specific type of villain - they’re thugs, brutish and animalistic. South Asian actors are similarly typecast as scary oppressive (usually coded Muslim) terrorists.
But when your villain is of the superhuman archetype? When they’re brooding antiheroes, when they’re nuanced, when they’re multi-faceted?
They’re white.
(And check out this post on the glorification of white criminality in shows like Dexter, Breaking Bad, Weeds, Boardwalk Empire, The Sopranos, etc.)
4
I cannot express how angry this article makes me.
In the beginning, my first reaction was hey, here’s something in ELLE of all the places saying it’s okay not to be conventionally pretty! And then I read through it, digested it, and it makes me feel sick. Walter Kirn is a douchebag, plain and simple.
In this piece, he vilifies conventionally pretty women and equates their personalities to unexciting milquetoast-y perfection. They’re boring with their salads and vapidity. Worst of all, they’re just disgustingly perfect, superficial and lack a deeper self… and of course, interchangeable once they’ve dolled themselves up.
Oh, but those “plain” ones! There’s something just magical about their unassuming looks, those darling “barefoot Cinderellas” without pretty images to preserve! They aren’t fussy eaters even if it means they aren’t as slim, with a beauty that “obeys no formulas” who dare to enjoy life unlike those fussy pretty women. There’s something sexually provocative a disciplined sexuality that just brings on the fantasies. Their secrets are exciting, unlike those bland pretty girls, and for both groups, their physical appearance is a direct reflection of their personalities.
Oh but wait, Kirn doesn’t really care about their personalities. He cares about their inability to entertain and excitement him. In one fell sweoop he objectifies them all, because in the end, it comes down to the emotional and sexual satisfaction of men. what does he say in thanks to these “plain women” who’ve been more than he expected and the conventionally beautiful ones who have let him down? thanks, women, for granting men a power they’ve longed for since they were teenagers to see through the layers to what really matters: the sexy center of a woman.
Mm, you know, I just feel so warm and fuzzy inside after reading this, so empowered and grateful to Mr. Kirn for this absolute gem. I mean, who cares what I look like? As long as I can grant men a secret exciting sense of power to see me for who I really am, at my sexy center, then that’s what really matters. Glad I have him to thank for this truly divine revelation about myself.
5084
“[W]hen we launch in a territory the Bittorrent traffic drops as the Netflix traffic grows. So I think people do want a great experience and they want access – people are mostly honest. The best way to combat piracy isn’t legislatively or criminally but by giving good options. One of the side effects of growth of content is an expectation to have access to it. You can’t use the internet as a marketing vehicle and then not as a delivery vehicle.”
—
Ted Sarandos, Chief Content Officer at Netflix (via laliberty)
Look, someone who gets it.
(via knitmeapony)
Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you. Same thing goes for pirated music where legit services such as Spotify are made available.
And because it bears repeating, Ted Sarandos’ most key words of wisdom:
You can’t use the internet as a marketing vehicle and then not as a delivery vehicle.
You can’t use the internet as a marketing vehicle and then not as a delivery vehicle.
You can’t use the internet as a marketing vehicle and then not as a delivery vehicle.
(via principia-coh)